Subjective Expected Utility and Psychological Gambles
Gianluca Cassese

TL;DR
This paper provides a simple characterization of expected utility using psychological gambles, relying only on coherence between preferences before and after choices, and extends to minimax and Choquet expected utility with weaker coherence.
Contribution
It introduces an elementary, coherence-based framework for expected utility and its variants, avoiding complex assumptions of traditional models.
Findings
Characterizes expected utility through psychological gambles and preference coherence.
Links weaker coherence to minimax and Choquet expected utility.
Provides a foundational understanding of decision models under uncertainty.
Abstract
We obtain an elementary characterization of expected utility based on a representation of choice in terms of psychological gambles, which requires no assumption other than coherence between ex-ante and ex-post preferences. Weaker version of coherence are associated with various attitudes towards complexity and lead to a characterization of minimax or Choquet expected utility.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic theories and models · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
