A Theoretical Investigation of the Grand- and the Canonical Potential Energy Surface: The Interplay between Electronic and Geometric Response at Electrified Interfaces

TL;DR

This paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of how electrochemical interfaces respond to electrode potential changes, focusing on energetics, charge, and capacitance, and compares canonical and grand canonical ensembles.

Contribution

It introduces a mathematical framework for understanding interfacial energetics at constant potential, revealing differences between ensembles and their impact on capacitance behavior.

Findings

Constant potential ensemble yields positive capacitances at local minima.

Capacitance of local minima in the constant charge ensemble can become negative.

Differences between ensembles are due to stationary point character switching.

Abstract

How does an electrochemical interface respond to changes in the electrode potential? How does the response affect the key properties of the system - energetics, excess charge, capacitance? Essential questions key to ab-initio simulations of electrochemical systems, which we address in this work on the basis of a rigorous mathematical evaluation of the interfacial energetics at constant applied potential. By explicitly taking into account the configurational and electronic degrees of freedom we derive important statements about stationary points in the electronically grand canonical ensemble. We analyze their geometric response to changes in electrode potential and show that it can be mapped identically onto an additional contribution to the system's capacitance. We draw similar conclusions for the constant charge ensemble which equally allows to assess the respective stationary points. Our analysis of the relation between the canonical and grand canonical energetics reveals, however, one key difference between both ensembles. While the constant potential ensemble yields in general positive capacitances at local minima, the capacitance of local minima in the constant charge ensemble might become negative. We trace back this feature to the possibility of character switching of stationary points when switching between the ensembles causing the differences in the response to perturbations. Our systematical analysis not only provides a detailed qualitative and quantitative understanding of the interplay between electronic and configurational degrees of freedom and their contributions to the energetics of electrified interfaces but also highlights the similarities and subtle dissimilarities between the canonical and grand canonical description of the electronic degrees of freedom, which is crucial for a better understanding of theoretical calculations with and without potentiostat.