A Note on Hardness of Computing Recursive Teaching Dimension
Pasin Manurangsi

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that computing the recursive teaching dimension (RTD) for a concept class is computationally hard, requiring super-polynomial time under the exponential time hypothesis, matching the brute-force algorithm's complexity.
Contribution
It establishes a tight lower bound on the computational complexity of calculating RTD, showing it is unlikely to be efficiently solvable.
Findings
Computing RTD requires $n^{ ext{Omega}( ext{log } n)}$ time under ETH.
The lower bound matches the brute-force algorithm's running time.
RTD computation is computationally hard under standard complexity assumptions.
Abstract
In this short note, we show that the problem of computing the recursive teaching dimension (RTD) for a concept class (given explicitly as input) requires -time, assuming the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). This matches the running time of the brute-force algorithm for the problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
