Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Hybrid, and Deep Learning Forecasting Models Evidence from European Financial Markets and Bitcoins
Apostolos Ampountolas

TL;DR
This paper compares statistical, machine learning, and deep learning models for forecasting European financial markets and cryptocurrencies, finding hybrid models like ETS-ANN often outperform others but with generally low accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of various forecasting models, highlighting the hybrid ETS-ANN model as a promising approach in financial time series prediction.
Findings
ARIMA performs best in 2018-2021
Hybrid ETS-ANN outperforms other models in most periods
Forecasting financial markets remains challenging with low accuracy
Abstract
This study analyzes the transmission of market uncertainty on key European financial markets and the cryptocurrency market over an extended period, encompassing the pre, during, and post-pandemic periods. Daily financial market indices and price observations are used to assess the forecasting models. We compare statistical, machine learning, and deep learning forecasting models to evaluate the financial markets, such as the ARIMA, hybrid ETS-ANN, and kNN predictive models. The study results indicate that predicting financial market fluctuations is challenging, and the accuracy levels are generally low in several instances. ARIMA and hybrid ETS-ANN models perform better over extended periods compared to the kNN model, with ARIMA being the best-performing model in 2018-2021 and the hybrid ETS-ANN model being the best-performing model in most of the other subperiods. Still, the kNN model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
