Reply to: Mobility overestimation in MoS$_2$ transistors due to invasive voltage probes
Hong Kuan Ng, Du Xiang, Ady Suwardi, Guangwei Hu, Ke Yang, Yunshan, Zhao, Tao Liu, Zhonghan Cao, Huajun Liu, Shisheng Li, Jing Cao, Qiang Zhu,, Zhaogang Dong, Chee Kiang Ivan Tan, Dongzhi Chi, Cheng-Wei Qiu, Kedar, Hippalgaonkar, Goki Eda, Ming Yang, Jing Wu

TL;DR
This paper refutes previous claims that invasive voltage probes cause mobility overestimation in MoS$_2$ transistors, demonstrating that non-linearity is an intrinsic property of disordered rippled-MoS$_2$ systems.
Contribution
It provides new experimental evidence showing that non-linearity in rippled-MoS$_2$ is intrinsic, challenging prior contact-effect explanations and critiquing Wu's ideal-system model.
Findings
Non-linearity is intrinsic to disordered rippled-MoS$_2$
Invasive probes do not cause mobility overestimation
Wu's model is incompatible with disordered systems
Abstract
In this reply, we include new experimental results and verify that the observed non-linearity in rippled-MoS (leading to mobility kink) is an intrinsic property of a disordered system, rather than contact effects (invasive probes) or other device issues. Noting that Peng Wu's hypothesis is based on a highly ordered ideal system, transfer curves are expected to be linear, and the carrier density is assumed be constant. Wu's model is therefore oversimplified for disordered systems and neglects carrier-density dependent scattering physics. Thus, it is fundamentally incompatible with our rippled-MoS, and leads to the wrong conclusion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum-Dot Cellular Automata
