Developing New Analysis Tools for Near Surface Radio-based Neutrino Detectors
ARIANNA Collaboration: A. Anker, P. Baldi, S. W. Barwick, J. Beise, D., Z. Besson, P. Chen, G. Gaswint, C. Glaser, A. Hallgren, J. C. Hanson, S. R., Klein, S. A. Kleinfelder, R. Lahmann, J. Liu, J. Nam, A. Nelles, M. P. Paul,, C. Persichilli, I. Plaisier, R. Rice-Smith, J. Tatar

TL;DR
This paper introduces new physics-based and deep learning analysis tools for the ARIANNA neutrino detector, significantly improving background rejection and neutrino detection efficiency for high-energy neutrino experiments in Antarctic ice.
Contribution
It develops and compares physics-based cuts and deep learning methods to enhance neutrino signal identification and background rejection in ARIANNA detectors.
Findings
Neutrino efficiency > 95% with 99.93% background rejection at 4.4 SNR threshold.
Deep learning cut achieves 99% signal efficiency and 99.997% background rejection.
Methods are validated with cosmic ray data, supporting large-scale future array deployment.
Abstract
The ARIANNA experiment is an Askaryan radio detector designed to measure high-energy neutrino induced cascades within the Antarctic ice. Ultra-high-energy neutrinos above eV have an extremely low flux, so experimental data captured at trigger level need to be classified correctly to retain more neutrino signal. We first describe two new physics-based neutrino selection methods, (the updown and dipole cut) that extend the previously published analysis to a specialized ARIANNA station with 8 antenna channels, which is double the number used in the prior analysis. For a standard trigger with a threshold signal to noise ratio at 4.4, the new cuts produce a neutrino efficiency of > 95% per station-year, while rejecting 99.93% of the background (corresponding to 53 remaining experimental background events). When the new cuts are combined with a previously developed cut using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
