Level Structures of $^{56,58}$Ca Cast Doubt on a doubly magic $^{60}$Ca
S. Chen, F. Browne, P. Doornenbal, J. Lee, A. Obertelli, Y. Tsunoda,, T. Otsuka, Y. Chazono, G. Hagen, J.D. Holt, G.R. Jansen, K. Ogata, N., Shimizu, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, N.L. Achouri, H. Baba, D. Calvet, F., Ch\^ateau, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M.L. Cort\'es, A. Delbart

TL;DR
This study investigates the nuclear structure of calcium isotopes $^{56}$Ca and $^{58}$Ca through gamma decay measurements, revealing a new shell structure that challenges the doubly magic nature of $^{60}$Ca and suggests a more extended calcium dripline.
Contribution
The paper provides experimental gamma decay data and shell-model calculations that identify a new shell above N=34, questioning the doubly magic status of $^{60}$Ca.
Findings
Observation of gamma transitions at 1456 keV and 1115 keV in $^{56}$Ca and $^{58}$Ca
Shell-model calculations agree with experimental level energies and separation energies
Degeneracy of $0f_{5/2}$ and $0g_{9/2}$ orbitals precludes doubly magic $^{60}$Ca
Abstract
Gamma decays were observed in Ca and Ca following quasi-free one-proton knockout reactions from Sc beams at MeV/nucleon. For Ca, a ray transition was measured to be 1456(12) keV, while for Ca an indication for a transition was observed at 1115(34) keV. Both transitions were tentatively assigned as the decays, and were compared to results from ab initio and conventional shell-model approaches. A shell-model calculation in a wide model space with a marginally modified effective nucleon-nucleon interaction depicts excellent agreement with experiment for level energies, two-neutron separation energies, and reaction cross sections, corroborating the formation of a new nuclear shell above the = 34 shell. Its constituents, the and orbitals, are almost degenerate. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
