AI For Global Climate Cooperation 2023 Competition Proceedings

TL;DR

This paper presents the proceedings of the 2023 AI for Global Climate Cooperation competition, which aimed to develop AI-driven international climate frameworks using simulations to promote collaboration, mitigate climate change, and balance economic growth.

Contribution

It introduces a novel interdisciplinary competition utilizing AI and climate-economic modeling to design and evaluate international climate cooperation protocols.

Findings

Proposals improved climate mitigation and economic productivity metrics.

Qualitative assessments emphasized effectiveness, feasibility, and ethics of proposed protocols.

The competition fostered innovative AI-based approaches to global climate policy design.

Abstract

The international community must collaborate to mitigate climate change and sustain economic growth. However, collaboration is hard to achieve, partly because no global authority can ensure compliance with international climate agreements. Combining AI with climate-economic simulations offers a promising solution to design international frameworks, including negotiation protocols and climate agreements, that promote and incentivize collaboration. In addition, these frameworks should also have policy goals fulfillment, and sustained commitment, taking into account climate-economic dynamics and strategic behaviors. These challenges require an interdisciplinary approach across machine learning, economics, climate science, law, policy, ethics, and other fields. Towards this objective, we organized AI for Global Climate Cooperation, a Mila competition in which teams submitted proposals and analyses of international frameworks, based on (modifications of) RICE-N, an AI-driven integrated assessment model (IAM). In particular, RICE-N supports modeling regional decision-making using AI agents. Furthermore, the IAM then models the climate-economic impact of those decisions into the future. Whereas the first track focused only on performance metrics, the proposals submitted to the second track were evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative evaluation focused on a combination of (i) the degree of mitigation of global temperature rise and (ii) the increase in economic productivity. On the other hand, an interdisciplinary panel of human experts in law, policy, sociology, economics and environmental science, evaluated the solutions qualitatively. In particular, the panel considered the effectiveness, simplicity, feasibility, ethics, and notions of climate justice of the protocols. In the third track, the participants were asked to critique and improve RICE-N.