A note on the incompleteness of Afshari & Leigh's system Clo
Johannes Kloibhofer

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the proof system Clo for the modal μ-calculus is incomplete by providing a valid sequent that it cannot prove, challenging its proposed completeness.
Contribution
It reveals the incompleteness of Afshari & Leigh's system Clo, showing it cannot prove all valid sequents in the modal μ-calculus.
Findings
Clo is incomplete for the modal μ-calculus
A specific valid sequent is not provable in Clo
Challenges the claimed completeness of Clo
Abstract
The system is a cyclic, cut-free proof system for the modal -calculus. It was introduced by Afshari & Leigh as an intermediate system in their intent to show the completeness of Kozen's axiomatisation for the modal -calculus. We prove that is incomplete by giving a valid sequent that is not provable in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Formal Methods in Verification
