Galois trace forms of type $A_{n}, D_{n}, E_{n}$ for odd $n$
Riku Higa, Yoshinosuke Hirakawa

TL;DR
This paper proves that for odd degree Galois extensions of the rationals, the trace form cannot be of types A, D, or E, contrasting with known cases for cyclotomic fields, and explores lattice structures in cubic fields.
Contribution
It establishes the non-existence of fractional ideals with trace forms of types A, D, E in odd degree Galois extensions, and shows the abundance of type A lattices in cyclic cubic fields.
Findings
No fractional ideals yield trace forms of types A, D, E in odd degree Galois extensions.
Every cyclic cubic field contains infinitely many sub lattices of type A.
Quadratic fields only contain certain type A lattices in specific cases.
Abstract
Let be an odd prime number and . Then, it is well-known that the -root lattice can be realized as the (Hermitian) trace form of the -th cyclotomic extension restricted to the fractional ideal generated by . In this paper, in contrast with the case of the -root lattice, we prove the following theorem: Let be an odd positive integer and be a Galois extension of degree . Then, there exist no fractional ideals of such that the restricted trace form is of type . The proof is done by the prime ideal factorization of fractional ideals of with care of certain 2-adic obstruction. Additionally, we prove that every cyclic cubic field contains infinitely many distinct sub…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology · Advanced Mathematical Identities
