Why and How to Implement Worked Examples in Upper Division Theoretical Physics
Philipp Scheiger, Ronny Nawrodt, Holger Cartarius

TL;DR
This paper advocates for implementing a four-step method of using worked examples in upper-division physics courses, emphasizing explanations and error correction to enhance problem-solving skills.
Contribution
It introduces a novel four-step teaching approach incorporating explanations and error correction, specifically tailored for upper-division physics education.
Findings
Effective in improving problem-solving skills
Can be integrated into graded coursework
Demonstrated with Lagrangian mechanics examples
Abstract
Studying worked examples has been shown by extensive research to be an effective method for learning to solve well-structured problems in physics and mathematics. The effectiveness of learning with worked examples has been demonstrated and documented in many research projects. In this work, we propose a new four-step approach for teaching with worked examples that includes writing explanations and finding and correcting errors. This teaching method can even be implemented in courses in which homework performance constitutes part of the grading system. This four-step approach is illustrated in the context of Lagrangian mechanics, which is ideal for the application of worked examples due to its universal approach to solve problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
