Robbed withdrawal
Ze Chen, Ruichao Jiang, Javad Tavakoli, Yiqiang Zhao

TL;DR
This paper critiques a key theorem in Lie et al. (2023), demonstrating its invalidity and showing that it leads to a critical vulnerability, called robbed withdrawal, in the Wombat Exchange decentralized platform.
Contribution
It identifies an error in a foundational theorem and reveals a new security flaw in the Wombat Exchange system resulting from this mistake.
Findings
Theorem 2 in Lie et al. (2023) is incorrect.
A new vulnerability called robbed withdrawal is identified.
Wombat Exchange is susceptible to this security flaw.
Abstract
In this article we show that Theorem 2 in Lie et al. (2023) is incorrect. Since Wombat Exchange, a decentralized exchange, is built upon Lie et al. (2023) and Theorem 2 is fundamental to Wombat Finance, we show that an undesirable phenomenon, which we call the robbed withdrawal, can happen as a consequence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models · Stochastic processes and financial applications · Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
