Borehole fibre-optic seismology inside the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream

TL;DR

This study demonstrates the use of Distributed Acoustic Sensing in a deep borehole to image the internal structure of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, revealing detailed seismic properties and climatic imprints.

Contribution

First application of DAS in a deep ice-core borehole to produce high-resolution seismic imaging of an ice stream's internal structure.

Findings

Achieved depth-dependent P and S wave speed models with 10 m/s uncertainty.

Generated detailed reflectivity images showing climatic and crystal fabric effects.

Identified current limitations in resolution due to frequency and noise issues.

Abstract

Ice streams are major contributors to ice sheet mass loss and sea level rise. Effects of their dynamic behaviour are imprinted into seismic properties, such as wave speeds and anisotropy. Here we present results from the first Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) experiment in a deep ice-core borehole in the onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream. A series of active surface sources produced clear recordings of the P and S wavefield, including internal reflections, along a 1500 m long fibre-optic cable that was lowered into the borehole. The combination of nonlinear traveltime tomography with a firn model constrained by multi-mode surface wave data, allows us to invert for P and S wave speeds with depth-dependent uncertainties on the order of only 10 m$/$s, and vertical resolution of 20--70 m. The wave speed model in conjunction with the regularly spaced DAS data enable a straightforward separation of internal upward reflections followed by a reverse-time migration that provides a detailed reflectivity image of the ice. While the differences between P and S wave speeds hint at anisotropy related to crystal orientation fabric, the reflectivity image seems to carry a pronounced climatic imprint caused by rapid variations in grain size. Currently, resolution is not limited by the DAS channel spacing. Instead, the maximum frequency of body waves below $\sim$200 Hz, low signal-to-noise ratio caused by poor coupling, and systematic errors produced by the ray approximation, appear to be the leading-order issues. Among these, only the latter has a simple existing solution in the form of full-waveform inversion. Improving signal bandwidth and quality, however, will likely require a significantly larger effort in terms of both sensing equipment and logistics.