Assessing Peer Award Diversification on Reddit
Amaury Trujillo

TL;DR
This study investigates how Reddit's diversification of awards impacted user engagement, revealing increased awarding levels and suggesting that more award options enhance platform interaction and monetization.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of the effects of award diversification on user behavior and engagement on Reddit.
Findings
Awarding level increased significantly after diversification
Two original awards remained most popular
More award options benefit user engagement and monetization
Abstract
Monetizing user-generated content in social media such as Reddit, in which users are both content creators and consumers, is challenging. Among the platform's strategies we find Reddit Awards, paid tokens of appreciation given by peer users who markedly enjoyed a particular posted content. Initially, there were only three awards, but the platform later greatly expanded their number and variety. This work thus aims to investigate how awarding changed after such diversification. To this end, two datasets of posts made before and after the change (16M submissions and 203M comments) were analyzed by operationalizing awarding level and award diversity. Results show that after diversification, the awarding level increased across multiple measures, both significantly and considerably, albeit two of the original three awards remained by far the most commonly given. Such an increase indicates…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
