Lightweight usable cryptography: a usability evaluation of the Ascon 1.2 family
Arne Padmos

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the usability of the Ascon 1.2 cryptographic algorithms, highlighting challenges in selection, application, and the need for user-centered design in lightweight cryptography standardization.
Contribution
First experimental usability evaluation of the Ascon 1.2 family informing standardization and design considerations for lightweight cryptography.
Findings
Difficulty in choosing and applying cryptographic algorithms
Confusion among multiple variants of algorithms
Importance of small interfaces and higher-level wrappers
Abstract
We present a usability study of the Ascon 1.2 family of cryptographic algorithms. As far as we know, this is the first published experimental evaluation aimed at a cryptographic design (i.e. not a specific API) with the purpose of informing which aspects to standardise. While the results show the general difficulty of choosing and applying cryptographic algorithms, there are some more specific insights. These include the possibility of confusing multiple variants, the relevance of small interfaces, and the desire for higher-level wrapper functions (e.g. for protocols). Overall, many questions are still open, including how usability could be integrated into the design and evaluation of cryptographic algorithms. Our main takeaway is that lightweight usable cryptography is an open research area that deserves greater focus. For the review of NISTIR 7977, the standardisation process of Ascon…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptographic Implementations and Security · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
