TL;DR
This paper introduces CAF, a causal framework for fair graph neural networks that selects realistic counterfactuals from training data to mitigate bias and improve fairness in node classification.
Contribution
It proposes a novel causal approach for fair GNNs by selecting realistic counterfactuals from training data, addressing limitations of previous methods.
Findings
CAF effectively reduces bias in GNNs.
Experimental results show improved fairness and accuracy.
The framework outperforms existing fairness-aware GNN methods.
Abstract
Graph neural networks have shown great ability in representation (GNNs) learning on graphs, facilitating various tasks. Despite their great performance in modeling graphs, recent works show that GNNs tend to inherit and amplify the bias from training data, causing concerns of the adoption of GNNs in high-stake scenarios. Hence, many efforts have been taken for fairness-aware GNNs. However, most existing fair GNNs learn fair node representations by adopting statistical fairness notions, which may fail to alleviate bias in the presence of statistical anomalies. Motivated by causal theory, there are several attempts utilizing graph counterfactual fairness to mitigate root causes of unfairness. However, these methods suffer from non-realistic counterfactuals obtained by perturbation or generation. In this paper, we take a causal view on fair graph learning problem. Guided by the casual…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Methodsfail · Counterfactuals Explanations
