Fatal errors and misuse of mathematics in the Hong-Page Theorem and Landemore's epistemic argument
\'Alvaro Romaniega

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the Hong-Page Theorems and Landemore's use of them, revealing errors and misinterpretations that highlight the importance of careful mathematical application in social science theories.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous critique of the theorems and their application, emphasizing the need for precise mathematical understanding in collective intelligence research.
Findings
Identifies errors in the Hong-Page Theorems
Highlights misinterpretations in Landemore's application
Underscores the importance of ability in group problem-solving
Abstract
In the pursuit of understanding collective intelligence, the Hong-Page Theorems have been presented as cornerstones of the interplay between diversity and ability. However, upon rigorous examination, there seem to be inherent problems and misinterpretations within these theorems. H\'el\`ene Landemore's application of these results in her epistemic argument and her political proposal showcases a invalid use of mathematical principles. This paper critically dissects the Hong-Page Theorems, revealing significant inconsistencies and oversights, and underscores the indispensable role of ``ability" in group problem-solving contexts. This paper aims not to undermine the importance of diversity, but rather to highlight the dangers of misusing mathematical principles and the necessity for a more careful analysis of mathematical results when applying them to social sciences.d the necessity for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Critical Realism in Sociology
