Counterfactual Explanation for Fairness in Recommendation
Xiangmeng Wang, Qian Li, Dianer Yu, Qing Li, Guandong Xu

TL;DR
This paper introduces CFairER, a novel method using counterfactual explanations and reinforcement learning to identify minimal attribute changes that improve fairness in recommendation systems, especially for discrete attributes.
Contribution
It proposes a new counterfactual explanation framework for recommendation fairness that avoids greedy search and handles discrete attributes using HINs and reinforcement learning.
Findings
CFairER generates faithful explanations for fairness.
The method maintains strong recommendation performance.
Attentive action pruning reduces computational complexity.
Abstract
Fairness-aware recommendation eliminates discrimination issues to build trustworthy recommendation systems.Explaining the causes of unfair recommendations is critical, as it promotes fairness diagnostics, and thus secures users' trust in recommendation models. Existing fairness explanation methods suffer high computation burdens due to the large-scale search space and the greedy nature of the explanation search process. Besides, they perform score-based optimizations with continuous values, which are not applicable to discrete attributes such as gender and race. In this work, we adopt the novel paradigm of counterfactual explanation from causal inference to explore how minimal alterations in explanations change model fairness, to abandon the greedy search for explanations. We use real-world attributes from Heterogeneous Information Networks (HINs) to empower counterfactual reasoning on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
MethodsPruning
