Categorical Realizability for Non-symmetric Closed Structures
Haruka Tomita

TL;DR
This paper explores the connections between applicative structures and various non-symmetric closed categorical structures, expanding the categorical realizability framework to include new classes of applicative structures and their corresponding categories.
Contribution
It identifies classes of applicative structures that induce non-symmetric closed categories, extending the existing theory and introducing planar linear combinatory algebras for linear logic models.
Findings
Characterization of applicative structures for non-symmetric closed categories
Introduction of planar linear combinatory algebras
Tight correspondence between categories and applicative structures
Abstract
In categorical realizability, it is common to construct categories of assemblies and categories of modest sets from applicative structures. These categories have structures corresponding to the structures of applicative structures. In the literature, classes of applicative structures inducing categorical structures such as Cartesian closed categories and symmetric monoidal closed categories have been widely studied. In this paper, we expand these correspondences between categories with structure and applicative structures by identifying the classes of applicative structures giving rise to closed multicategories, closed categories, monoidal bi-closed categories as well as (non-symmetric) monoidal closed categories. These applicative structures are planar in that they correspond to appropriate planar lambda calculi by combinatory completeness. These new correspondences are tight: we show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
