Understanding the Efficacy of U-Net & Vision Transformer for Groundwater Numerical Modelling
Maria Luisa Taccari, Oded Ovadia, He Wang, Adar Kahana, Xiaohui Chen,, Peter K. Jimack

TL;DR
This study compares U-Net, U-Net with Vision Transformers, and Fourier Neural Operator for groundwater modeling, showing U-Net variants excel in accuracy and efficiency, especially with sparse data.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of U-Net, U-Net + ViT, and FNO models for groundwater modeling, highlighting the superior performance of U-Net-based models in data-scarce conditions.
Findings
U-Net and U-Net + ViT outperform FNO in accuracy.
U-Net models are more efficient in sparse data scenarios.
U-Net-based models show promise for real-world groundwater applications.
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of various machine learning models, namely U-Net, U-Net integrated with Vision Transformers (ViT), and Fourier Neural Operator (FNO), for time-dependent forward modelling in groundwater systems. Through testing on synthetic datasets, it is demonstrated that U-Net and U-Net + ViT models outperform FNO in accuracy and efficiency, especially in sparse data scenarios. These findings underscore the potential of U-Net-based models for groundwater modelling in real-world applications where data scarcity is prevalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Groundwater flow and contamination studies · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Methods*Communicated@Fast*How Do I Communicate to Expedia? · Convolution · Concatenated Skip Connection · Max Pooling · U-Net
