Uncovering the limits of uniqueness in sampled Gabor phase retrieval: A dense set of counterexamples in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$
Rima Alaifari, Francesca Bartolucci, Matthias Wellershoff

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the set of signals in $L^2( eal)$ that cannot be uniquely recovered from sampled Gabor phase measurements is dense, revealing fundamental limits in phase retrieval with practical implications.
Contribution
It proves the density of non-uniqueness counterexamples in $L^2( eal)$ for sampled Gabor phase retrieval, extending previous classifications.
Findings
Counterexamples are dense in $L^2( eal)$.
Non-uniqueness does not encompass all signals.
Provides insights into fundamental limits of phase retrieval.
Abstract
Sampled Gabor phase retrieval - the problem of recovering a square-integrable signal from the magnitude of its Gabor transform sampled on a lattice - is a fundamental problem in signal processing, with important applications in areas such as imaging and audio processing. Recently, a classification of square-integrable signals which are not phase retrievable from Gabor measurements on parallel lines has been presented. This classification was used to exhibit a family of counterexamples to uniqueness in sampled Gabor phase retrieval. Here, we show that the set of counterexamples to uniqueness in sampled Gabor phase retrieval is dense in , but is not equal to the whole of in general. Overall, our work contributes to a better understanding of the fundamental limits of sampled Gabor phase retrieval.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Image and Object Detection Techniques
