Reliable density functional and G_0 W_0 approaches to the calculation of bandgaps in 2D materials
Musen Li, Michael J. Ford, Rika Kobayashi, Roger D. Amos, Jeffrey, R. Reimers

TL;DR
This study shows that CAM-B3LYP functional provides more reliable and consistent bandgap calculations for 2D materials when used as a starting point for G0W0 computations, improving accuracy over traditional functionals.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that CAM-B3LYP is a superior starting point for G0W0 calculations in 2D materials, reducing deviations and improving orbital representation accuracy.
Findings
CAM-B3LYP yields minimal bandgap deviations (~0.23 eV) in G0W0 calculations.
Traditional functionals like PBE, PBE0, HSE06 show larger deviations (~1.07-1.51 eV).
CAM-B3LYP provides a better orbital representation for 2D materials.
Abstract
Optimizing density-functional theory (DFT) and G0W0 calculations present coupled problems as orbitals from DFT are needed as G0W0 starting points. Applied to 341 two-dimensional (2D) materials, we demonstrate that CAM-B3LYP provides minimal changes in bandgap (e.g., mean absolute deviation of 0.23 eV) when used to start G0W0 calculations, compared to traditional functionals such as PBE, PBE0, and HSE06 (1.07 eV, 1.48 eV, and 1.51 eV, respectively). CAM-B3LYP also delivers the smallest changes in orbital representation. These and other results indicate the suitability of CAM-B3LYP as a density-functional approach for modelling 2D materials, as well as for use in optimizing G0W0 calculations. Our findings parallel well established features of applications to molecules, as well as for spectroscopic applications involving 3D materials.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science
