Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacy
Georgios Kaissis, Jamie Hayes, Alexander Ziller, Daniel Rueckert

TL;DR
This paper establishes a connection between hypothesis testing differential privacy and Reconstruction Robustness, deriving explicit bounds for common DP mechanisms, enhancing understanding of privacy guarantees against data reconstruction attacks.
Contribution
It introduces a new analytical framework linking hypothesis testing DP to ReRo, providing closed-form bounds for Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms.
Findings
Derived ReRo bounds for Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms
Connected hypothesis testing DP with data reconstruction robustness
Provided explicit bounds for subsampled DP mechanisms
Abstract
We explore Reconstruction Robustness (ReRo), which was recently proposed as an upper bound on the success of data reconstruction attacks against machine learning models. Previous research has demonstrated that differential privacy (DP) mechanisms also provide ReRo, but so far, only asymptotic Monte Carlo estimates of a tight ReRo bound have been shown. Directly computable ReRo bounds for general DP mechanisms are thus desirable. In this work, we establish a connection between hypothesis testing DP and ReRo and derive closed-form, analytic or numerical ReRo bounds for the Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms and their subsampled variants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
