Stellar Half-Mass Radii of $0.5<z<2.3$ Galaxies: Comparison with JWST/NIRCam Half-Light Radii

TL;DR

This study compares JWST/NIRCam near-infrared light profiles with stellar mass-based sizes of galaxies at redshifts 0.5 to 2.3, confirming previous size evolution findings with improved near-IR data.

Contribution

It demonstrates that rest-frame near-IR sizes from JWST closely match stellar mass radii, reinforcing the size evolution trends established from optical observations.

Findings

Rest-frame near-IR half-light radii are up to 40% smaller than optical half-light radii.

Excellent agreement between near-IR radii and stellar mass radii with negligible systematic offset.

Massive quiescent galaxies show rapid size evolution with redshift, consistent with previous studies.

Abstract

We use CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging to measure rest-frame near-IR light profiles of $>$500 $M_\star>10^{10}~M_\odot$ galaxies in the redshift range $0.5<z<2.3$. We compare the resulting rest-frame 1.5-2$\mu$m half-light radii ($R_{\rm{NIR}}$) with stellar half-mass radii (\rmass) derived with multi-color light profiles from CANDELS HST imaging. In general agreement with previous work, we find that $R_{\rm{NIR}}$ and \rmass~are up to 40\%~smaller than the rest-frame optical half-light radius $R_{\rm{opt}}$. The agreement between $R_{\rm{NIR}}$ and \rmass~is excellent, with negligible systematic offset ($<$0.03 dex) up to $z=2$ for quiescent galaxies and up to $z=1.5$ for star-forming galaxies. We also deproject the profiles to estimate \rmassd, the radius of a sphere containing 50\% of the stellar mass. We present the $R-M_\star$ distribution of galaxies at $0.5<z<1.5$, comparing $R_{\rm{opt}}$, \rmass~and \rmassd. The slope is significantly flatter for \rmass~and \rmassd~ compared to $R_{\rm{opt}}$, mostly due to downward shifts in size for massive star-forming galaxies, while \rmass~and \rmassd~do not show markedly different trends. Finally, we show rapid size evolution ($R\propto (1+z)^{-1.7\pm0.1}$) for massive ($M_\star>10^{11}~M_\odot$) quiescent galaxies between $z=0.5$ and $z=2.3$, again comparing $R_{\rm{opt}}$, \rmass~and \rmassd. We conclude that the main tenets of the size evolution narrative established over the past 20 years, based on rest-frame optical light profile analysis, still hold in the era of JWST/NIRCam observations in the rest-frame near-IR.