Analyzing the Performance of ChatGPT in Cardiology and Vascular Pathologies
Walid Hariri

TL;DR
This study evaluates ChatGPT's accuracy in answering cardiology and vascular pathology questions, demonstrating its potential as a valuable tool in medical education by outperforming students in a quiz-based assessment.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's performance in cardiology and vascular pathologies, highlighting its high accuracy compared to medical students.
Findings
ChatGPT scored 92.10% on the QCM dataset.
ChatGPT outperformed the two medical students.
The results suggest ChatGPT's potential in medical education.
Abstract
The article aims to analyze the performance of ChatGPT, a large language model developed by OpenAI, in the context of cardiology and vascular pathologies. The study evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering challenging multiple-choice questions (QCM) using a dataset of 190 questions from the Siamois-QCM platform. The goal was to assess ChatGPT potential as a valuable tool in medical education compared to two well-ranked students of medicine. The results showed that ChatGPT outperformed the students, scoring 175 out of 190 correct answers with a percentage of 92.10\%, while the two students achieved scores of 163 and 159 with percentages of 85.78\% and 82.63\%, respectively. These results showcase how ChatGPT has the potential to be highly effective in the fields of cardiology and vascular pathologies by providing accurate answers to relevant questions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
