ChatGPT Creates a Review Article: State of the Art in the Most-Cited Articles on ChatGPT in Health Science, Computer Science, Communication, and Culture, According to Altmetric in Dimensions.ai
Eduard Petiska

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that ChatGPT can generate structured review articles based on influential preprints across multiple disciplines, indicating its potential to automate scholarly review writing.
Contribution
It is the first to show ChatGPT's ability to synthesize and create review articles from influential scientific preprints across diverse fields.
Findings
ChatGPT successfully generated a structured review article.
The generated review covers multiple disciplines including health science, computer science, communication, and culture.
Results suggest ChatGPT's potential in automating scholarly review writing.
Abstract
We have analyzed all preprints on ChatGPT (N=501) and selected the most influential preprints (according to Altmetric) about ChatGPT across scientific disciplines to provide the most discussed research results about ChatGPT. We prompted ChatGPT to create a structured review article based on them. The results are surprisingly promising, suggesting that the future of creating review articles can lie in ChatGPT.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
