Transgressing the boundaries: towards a rigorous understanding of deep learning and its (non-)robustness
Carsten Hartmann, Lorenz Richter

TL;DR
This paper reviews the theoretical understanding of deep learning, focusing on robustness, interpretability, and uncertainty quantification, highlighting the gap between practical success and mathematical foundations.
Contribution
It systematically bridges approximation theory and statistical learning theory to address robustness and interpretability issues in deep learning.
Findings
Analysis of robustness challenges in DL
Review of Bayesian methods for uncertainty quantification
Connections between approximation theory and DL robustness
Abstract
The recent advances in machine learning in various fields of applications can be largely attributed to the rise of deep learning (DL) methods and architectures. Despite being a key technology behind autonomous cars, image processing, speech recognition, etc., a notorious problem remains the lack of theoretical understanding of DL and related interpretability and (adversarial) robustness issues. Understanding the specifics of DL, as compared to, say, other forms of nonlinear regression methods or statistical learning, is interesting from a mathematical perspective, but at the same time it is of crucial importance in practice: treating neural networks as mere black boxes might be sufficient in certain cases, but many applications require waterproof performance guarantees and a deeper understanding of what could go wrong and why it could go wrong. It is probably fair to say that, despite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Forecasting Techniques and Applications
