Quantifying Poynting flux in the Quiet Sun Photosphere

TL;DR

This study evaluates methods to quantify Poynting flux in the quiet Sun photosphere using observations and simulations, addressing challenges like resolution and noise, and compares results with theoretical energy loss estimates.

Contribution

It introduces a new azimuth disambiguation method and compares electric field inference techniques, improving Poynting flux estimation accuracy in quiet Sun regions.

Findings

DeepVel outperforms FLCT for small-scale QS flows

Some Poynting flux estimates match chromospheric and coronal energy losses

Optical depth affects Poynting flux measurements, causing underestimation

Abstract

Poynting flux is the flux of magnetic energy, which is responsible for chromospheric and coronal heating in the solar atmosphere. It is defined as a cross product of electric and magnetic fields, and in ideal MHD conditions it can be expressed in terms of magnetic field and plasma velocity. Poynting flux has been computed for active regions and plages, but estimating it in the quiet Sun (QS) remains challenging due to resolution effects and polarimetric noise. However, with upcoming DKIST capabilities, these estimates will become more feasible than ever before. Here, we study QS Poynting flux in Sunrise/IMaX observations and MURaM simulations. We explore two methods for inferring transverse velocities from observations - FLCT and a neural network based method DeepVel - and show DeepVel to be the more suitable method in the context of small-scale QS flows. We investigate the effect of azimuthal ambiguity on Poynting flux estimates, and we describe a new method for azimuth disambiguation. Finally, we use two methods for obtaining the electric field. The first method relies on idealized Ohm's law, whereas the second is a state-of-the-art inductive electric field inversion method PDFI SS. We compare the resulting Poynting flux values with theoretical estimates for chromospheric and coronal energy losses and find that some of Poynting flux estimates are sufficient to match the losses. Using MURaM simulations, we show that photospheric Poynting fluxes vary significantly with optical depth, and that there is an observational bias that results in underestimated Poynting fluxes due to unaccounted shear term contribution.