Multi-IRS-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communications

TL;DR

This paper explores a multi-IRS-enabled integrated sensing and communications system, deriving bounds for target parameter estimation and optimizing beamformers to enhance sensing accuracy while maintaining communication quality.

Contribution

It introduces a novel multi-IRS ISAC framework with semi-passive IRSs, deriving CRBs for different target models and proposing joint beamforming optimization for improved sensing and communication performance.

Findings

CRB for DoA estimation inversely proportional to cube of IRS sensors

CRB for target response proportional to number of IRS sensors

Optimized beamformers improve sensing accuracy under communication constraints

Abstract

This paper studies a multi-intelligent-reflecting-surface-(IRS)-enabled integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) system, in which multiple IRSs are installed to help the base station (BS) provide ISAC services at separate line-of-sight (LoS) blocked areas. We focus on the scenario with semi-passive uniform linear array (ULA) IRSs for sensing, in which each IRS is integrated with dedicated sensors for processing echo signals, and each IRS simultaneously serves one sensing target and multiple communication users (CUs) in its coverage area. In particular, we suppose that the BS sends combined information and dedicated sensing signals for ISAC. Two cases with point and extended targets are considered, in which each IRS aims to estimate the direction-of-arrival (DoA) of the corresponding target and the complete target response matrix, respectively. Under this setup, we first derive the closed-form Cram{\'e}r-Rao bounds (CRBs) for parameters estimation under the two target models. For the point target case, the CRB for DoA estimation is shown to be inversely proportional to the cubic of the number of sensors at each IRS, while for the extended target case, the CRB for target response matrix estimation is proportional to the number of IRS sensors. Next, we consider two different types of CU receivers that can and cannot cancel the interference from dedicated sensing signals prior to information decoding. To achieve fair and optimized sensing performance, we minimize the maximum CRB at all IRSs for the two target cases, via jointly optimizing the transmit beamformers at the BS and the reflective beamformers at the multiple IRSs, subject to the minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraints at individual CUs, the maximum transmit power constraint at the BS, and the unit-modulus constraints at the multiple IRSs.