Exploring Non-Verbal Predicates in Semantic Role Labeling: Challenges and Opportunities
Riccardo Orlando, Simone Conia, Roberto Navigli

TL;DR
This paper highlights the limitations of current SRL benchmarks in capturing non-verbal predicates, introduces a new dataset and challenge set to address this gap, and demonstrates the need for improved models to handle diverse predicate types.
Contribution
It presents a new PropBank dataset covering multiple predicate types and a challenge set to evaluate and improve SRL systems on non-verbal predicates.
Findings
Standard benchmarks underestimate non-verbal predicate performance.
State-of-the-art SRL systems struggle with cross-predicate transfer.
The new datasets reveal significant gaps in current SRL capabilities.
Abstract
Although we have witnessed impressive progress in Semantic Role Labeling (SRL), most of the research in the area is carried out assuming that the majority of predicates are verbs. Conversely, predicates can also be expressed using other parts of speech, e.g., nouns and adjectives. However, non-verbal predicates appear in the benchmarks we commonly use to measure progress in SRL less frequently than in some real-world settings -- newspaper headlines, dialogues, and tweets, among others. In this paper, we put forward a new PropBank dataset which boasts wide coverage of multiple predicate types. Thanks to it, we demonstrate empirically that standard benchmarks do not provide an accurate picture of the current situation in SRL and that state-of-the-art systems are still incapable of transferring knowledge across different predicate types. Having observed these issues, we also present a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification
