The Lawn Mowing Problem: From Algebra to Algorithms

TL;DR

This paper investigates the computational complexity of the Lawn Mowing Problem, revealing its algebraic hardness, and introduces new approximation methods and practical solutions for specific polygon classes and benchmark instances.

Contribution

It proves the algebraic hardness of the LMP, develops a construction method with improved approximation guarantees for polyominoes, and demonstrates practical solutions for larger, more general polygons.

Findings

LMP is algebraically hard, not solvable by radicals over rationals.

New construction method improves approximation guarantees for polyominoes.

Practical solutions outperform previous methods on benchmark polygons.

Abstract

For a given polygonal region $P$, the Lawn Mowing Problem (LMP) asks for a shortest tour $T$ that gets within Euclidean distance 1/2 of every point in $P$; this is equivalent to computing a shortest tour for a unit-diameter cutter $C$ that covers all of $P$. As a generalization of the Traveling Salesman Problem, the LMP is NP-hard; unlike the discrete TSP, however, the LMP has defied efforts to achieve exact solutions, due to its combination of combinatorial complexity with continuous geometry. We provide a number of new contributions that provide insights into the involved difficulties, as well as positive results that enable both theoretical and practical progress. (1) We show that the LMP is algebraically hard: it is not solvable by radicals over the field of rationals, even for the simple case in which $P$ is a $2\times 2$ square. This implies that it is impossible to compute exact optimal solutions under models of computation that rely on elementary arithmetic operations and the extraction of $k$th roots, and explains the perceived practical difficulty. (2) We exploit this algebraic analysis for the natural class of polygons with axis-parallel edges and integer vertices (i.e., polyominoes), highlighting the relevance of turn-cost minimization for Lawn Mowing tours, and leading to a general construction method for feasible tours. (3) We show that this construction method achieves theoretical worst-case guarantees that improve previous approximation factors for polyominoes. (4) We demonstrate the practical usefulness \emph{beyond polyominoes} by performing an extensive practical study on a spectrum of more general benchmark polygons: We obtain solutions that are better than the previous best values by Fekete et al., for instance sizes up to $20$ times larger.