5G Wings: Investigating 5G-Connected Drones Performance in Non-Urban Areas

TL;DR

This study evaluates the performance of 5G-connected drones in non-urban areas, comparing it with LTE, and offers recommendations to improve drone communication quality over existing networks.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive experimental analysis of drone performance over current 5G networks in suburban areas, highlighting challenges and potential improvements.

Findings

5G networks offer improved KPIs over LTE for drones in suburban areas.

Drone velocity and elevation significantly affect communication performance.

Recommendations for trajectory control can enhance drone communication quality.

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become extremely popular for both military and civilian applications due to their ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness, high maneuverability, and availability. Both applications, however, need reliable communication for command and control (C2) and/or data transmission. Utilizing commercial cellular networks for drone communication can enable beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operation, high data rate transmission, and secure communication. However, deployment of cellular-connected drones over commercial LTE/5G networks still presents various challenges such as sparse coverage outside urban areas, and interference caused to the network as the UAV is visible to many towers. Commercial 5G networks can offer various features for aerial user equipment (UE) far beyond what LTE could provide by taking advantage of mmWave, flexible numerology, slicing, and the capability of applying AI-based solutions. Limited experimental data is available to investigate the operation of aerial UEs over current, without any modification, commercial 5G networks, particularly in suburban and NON-URBAN areas. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive study of drone communications over the existing low-band and mid-band 5G networks in a suburban area for different velocities and elevations, comparing the performance against that of LTE. It is important to acknowledge that the network examined in this research is primarily designed and optimized to meet the requirements of terrestrial users, and may not adequately address the needs of aerial users. This paper not only reports the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) compared among all combinations of the test cases but also provides recommendations for aerial users to enhance their communication quality by controlling their trajectory.