Redeeming Data Science by Decision Modelling
John Mark Agosta, Robert Horton

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a new approach called Decision Modelling that integrates causal graphical models and value frameworks to ground Data Science practices in AI principles, emphasizing decision quality.
Contribution
It introduces Decision Modelling as a novel framework combining ML models with explicit value models, grounded in Bayesian and AI techniques, to improve Data Science applications.
Findings
Decision Modelling integrates ML with value models like utility.
It applies causal graphical models to Data Science.
The framework emphasizes six principles of Decision Quality.
Abstract
With the explosion of applications of Data Science, the field is has come loose from its foundations. This article argues for a new program of applied research in areas familiar to researchers in Bayesian methods in AI that are needed to ground the practice of Data Science by borrowing from AI techniques for model formulation that we term ``Decision Modelling.'' This article briefly reviews the formulation process as building a causal graphical model, then discusses the process in terms of six principles that comprise \emph{Decision Quality}, a framework from the popular business literature. We claim that any successful applied ML modelling effort must include these six principles. We explain how Decision Modelling combines a conventional machine learning model with an explicit value model. To give a specific example we show how this is done by integrating a model's ROC curve with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Data Quality and Management · Big Data and Business Intelligence
