TL;DR
This paper introduces a scalable, likelihood-free Bayesian experimental design method that efficiently estimates the expected posterior variance without sampling the posterior, significantly reducing computational costs in PDE-based models.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach using the law of total variance and neural networks to approximate the expected conditional variance without posterior sampling, enhancing efficiency.
Findings
Reduces the number of observational model evaluations compared to importance sampling.
Provides an asymptotic error estimate for the proposed variance estimator.
Demonstrates effectiveness on PDE-based experimental design problems.
Abstract
We address the computational efficiency in solving the A-optimal Bayesian design of experiments problems for which the observational map is based on partial differential equations and, consequently, is computationally expensive to evaluate. A-optimality is a widely used and easy-to-interpret criterion for Bayesian experimental design. This criterion seeks the optimal experimental design by minimizing the expected conditional variance, which is also known as the expected posterior variance. This study presents a novel likelihood-free approach to the A-optimal experimental design that does not require sampling or integrating the Bayesian posterior distribution. The expected conditional variance is obtained via the variance of the conditional expectation using the law of total variance, and we take advantage of the orthogonal projection property to approximate the conditional expectation.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
