Minimax optimal subgroup identification
Matteo Bonvini, Edward H. Kennedy, and Luke J. Keele

TL;DR
This paper develops minimax optimal methods for estimating treatment effect level sets, crucial for personalized treatment decisions, and analyzes their theoretical properties and practical performance.
Contribution
It introduces a minimax optimal estimator for CATE level sets under smoothness and margin conditions, filling a gap in theoretical understanding.
Findings
Derived asymptotic properties of level set estimators.
Identified a minimax optimal estimator under smoothness assumptions.
Validated methods through simulations and real data analysis.
Abstract
Quantifying treatment effect heterogeneity is a crucial task in many areas of causal inference, e.g. optimal treatment allocation and estimation of subgroup effects. We study the problem of estimating the level sets of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE), identified under the no-unmeasured-confounders assumption. Given a user-specified threshold, the goal is to estimate the set of all units for whom the treatment effect exceeds that threshold. For example, if the cutoff is zero, the estimand is the set of all units who would benefit from receiving treatment. Assigning treatment just to this set represents the optimal treatment rule that maximises the mean population outcome. Similarly, cutoffs greater than zero represent optimal rules under resource constraints. The level set estimator that we study follows the plug-in principle and consists of simply thresholding a good…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
