Efficient Parallel Output-Sensitive Edit Distance

TL;DR

This paper introduces output-sensitive parallel algorithms for computing edit distance, optimizing performance for similar strings with small edit distances, and compares their theoretical guarantees and practical performance.

Contribution

It presents four novel parallel algorithms for edit distance, including BFS-based and divide-and-conquer approaches, with new data structures for LCP queries and comprehensive empirical evaluation.

Findings

BFS-based algorithms outperform existing implementations in tests.

Different algorithms suit different input patterns, guiding their selection.

The study provides the first systematic analysis of parallel edit distance algorithms.

Abstract

Given two strings $A[1..n]$ and $B[1..m]$, and a set of operations allowed to edit the strings, the edit distance between $A$ and $B$ is the minimum number of operations required to transform $A$ into $B$. Sequentially, a standard Dynamic Programming (DP) algorithm solves edit distance with $\Theta(nm)$ cost. In many real-world applications, the strings to be compared are similar and have small edit distances. To achieve highly practical implementations, we focus on output-sensitive parallel edit-distance algorithms, i.e., to achieve asymptotically better cost bounds than the standard $\Theta(nm)$ algorithm when the edit distance is small. We study four algorithms in the paper, including three algorithms based on Breadth-First Search (BFS) and one algorithm based on Divide-and-Conquer (DaC). Our BFS-based solution is based on the Landau-Vishkin algorithm. We implement three different data structures for the longest common prefix (LCP) queries needed in the algorithm: the classic solution using parallel suffix array, and two hash-based solutions proposed in this paper. Our DaC-based solution is inspired by the output-insensitive solution proposed by Apostolico et al., and we propose a non-trivial adaption to make it output-sensitive. All our algorithms have good theoretical guarantees, and they achieve different tradeoffs between work (total number of operations), span (longest dependence chain in the computation), and space. We test and compare our algorithms on both synthetic data and real-world data. Our BFS-based algorithms outperform the existing parallel edit-distance implementation in ParlayLib in all test cases. By comparing our algorithms, we also provide a better understanding of the choice of algorithms for different input patterns. We believe that our paper is the first systematic study in the theory and practice of parallel edit distance.