Registration between DCT and EBSD datasets for multiphase microstructures

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel registration method to align 3D DCT microstructure data with 2D EBSD maps, enabling detailed comparison of phase, size, and orientation in multiphase materials.

Contribution

A new grain-averaged orientation-based registration technique for aligning DCT and EBSD datasets with minimal prior knowledge.

Findings

DCT accurately measures large grain positions, orientations, and sizes.

Registration method effectively identifies corresponding slices between DCT and EBSD.

DCT captures complex grain networks not visible in EBSD data.

Abstract

The ability to characterise the three-dimensional microstructure of multiphase materials is essential for understanding the interaction between phases and associated materials properties. Here, laboratory-based diffraction-contrast tomography (DCT), a recently-established materials characterization technique that can determine grain phases, morphologies, positions and orientations in a voxel-based reconstruction method, was used to map part of a dual-phase steel alloy sample. To assess the resulting microstructures that were produced by the DCT technique, an EBSD map was collected within the same sample volume. To identify the 2D slice of the 3D DCT reconstruction that best corresponded to the EBSD map, a novel registration technique based solely on grain-averaged orientations was developed -- this registration technique requires very little a priori knowledge of dataset alignment and can be extended to other techniques that only recover grain-averaged orientation data such as far-field 3D X-ray diffraction microscopy. Once the corresponding 2D slice was identified in the DCT dataset, comparisons of phase balance, grain size, shape and texture were performed between DCT and EBSD techniques. More complicated aspects of the microstructural morphology such as grain boundary shape and grains less than a critical size were poorly reproduced by the DCT reconstruction, primarily due to the difference in resolutions of the technique compared with EBSD. However, lab-based DCT is shown to accurately determine the centre-of-mass position, orientation, and size of the large grains for each phase present, austenite and martensitic ferrite. The results reveals a complex ferrite grain network of similar crystal orientations that are absent from the EBSD dataset. Such detail demonstrates that lab-based DCT, as a technique, shows great promise in the field of multi-phase material characterization.