Laxity-Aware Scalable Reinforcement Learning for HVAC Control

TL;DR

This paper introduces a scalable reinforcement learning approach for HVAC control that leverages laxity to efficiently manage large populations of systems, improving demand flexibility and energy cost savings.

Contribution

It proposes a two-level control framework using laxity and RL to address high-dimensional HVAC management and optimize demand response.

Findings

Outperforms centralized methods in most scenarios

Achieves comparable results to model-based approaches in some cases

Effective in both single-zone and multi-zone HVAC systems

Abstract

Demand flexibility plays a vital role in maintaining grid balance, reducing peak demand, and saving customers' energy bills. Given their highly shiftable load and significant contribution to a building's energy consumption, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems can provide valuable demand flexibility to the power systems by adjusting their energy consumption in response to electricity price and power system needs. To exploit this flexibility in both operation time and power, it is imperative to accurately model and aggregate the load flexibility of a large population of HVAC systems as well as designing effective control algorithms. In this paper, we tackle the curse of dimensionality issue in modeling and control by utilizing the concept of laxity to quantify the emergency level of each HVAC operation request. We further propose a two-level approach to address energy optimization for a large population of HVAC systems. The lower level involves an aggregator to aggregate HVAC load laxity information and use least-laxity-first (LLF) rule to allocate real-time power for individual HVAC systems based on the controller's total power. Due to the complex and uncertain nature of HVAC systems, we leverage a reinforcement learning (RL)-based controller to schedule the total power based on the aggregated laxity information and electricity price. We evaluate the temperature control and energy cost saving performance of a large-scale group of HVAC systems in both single-zone and multi-zone scenarios, under varying climate and electricity market conditions. The experiment results indicate that proposed approach outperforms the centralized methods in the majority of test scenarios, and performs comparably to model-based method in some scenarios.