The NANOGrav 15-year Gravitational-Wave Background Methods
Aaron D. Johnson, Patrick M. Meyers, Paul T. Baker, Neil J. Cornish, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Tyson B. Littenberg, Joseph D. Romano, Stephen R. Taylor, Michele Vallisneri, Sarah J. Vigeland, Ken D. Olum, Xavier Siemens, Justin A. Ellis, Rutger van Haasteren, Sophie Hourihane

TL;DR
This paper rigorously tests and updates methods for detecting nanohertz gravitational waves using pulsar timing arrays, introducing a faster likelihood computation and validating analysis techniques over 15 years of data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel two-step marginalization likelihood method and provides comprehensive validation of PTA analysis techniques for gravitational wave background detection.
Findings
Validated current PTA analysis methods.
Introduced faster likelihood computation technique.
Confirmed consistency of Bayesian and frequentist approaches.
Abstract
Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) use an array of millisecond pulsars to search for gravitational waves in the nanohertz regime in pulse time of arrival data. This paper presents rigorous tests of PTA methods, examining their consistency across the relevant parameter space. We discuss updates to the 15-year isotropic gravitational-wave background analyses and their corresponding code representations. Descriptions of the internal structure of the flagship algorithms Enterprise and PTMCMCSampler are given to facilitate understanding of the PTA likelihood structure, how models are built, and what methods are currently used in sampling the high-dimensional PTA parameter space. We introduce a novel version of the PTA likelihood that uses a two-step marginalization procedure that performs much faster in gravitational wave searches, reducing the required resources facilitating the computation of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
