The NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set: Detector Characterization and Noise Budget
Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven, Arzoumanian, Paul T. Baker, Bence B\'ecsy, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul, R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, Tyler Cohen,, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the noise characteristics and sensitivity of the NANOGrav 15-year pulsar timing array data, providing a detailed noise model and sensitivity estimates for low-frequency gravitational wave detection.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive noise characterization method for PTA data and calculates the global sensitivity to stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds.
Findings
Minimum noise characteristic strain of 7×10⁻¹⁵ at 5 nHz
Sensitivity curves align with previous GW background analyses
Effective noise modeling preserves sensitivity to various GW signals
Abstract
Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are galactic-scale gravitational wave detectors. Each individual arm, composed of a millisecond pulsar, a radio telescope, and a kiloparsecs-long path, differs in its properties but, in aggregate, can be used to extract low-frequency gravitational wave (GW) signals. We present a noise and sensitivity analysis to accompany the NANOGrav 15-year data release and associated papers, along with an in-depth introduction to PTA noise models. As a first step in our analysis, we characterize each individual pulsar data set with three types of white noise parameters and two red noise parameters. These parameters, along with the timing model and, particularly, a piecewise-constant model for the time-variable dispersion measure, determine the sensitivity curve over the low-frequency GW band we are searching. We tabulate information for all of the pulsars in this data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
