Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array
Daniel J. Reardon, Andrew Zic, Ryan M. Shannon, George B. Hobbs,, Matthew Bailes, Valentina Di Marco, Agastya Kapur, Axl F. Rogers, Eric, Thrane, Jacob Askew, N. D. Ramesh Bhat, Andrew Cameron, Ma{\l}gorzata, Cury{\l}o, William A. Coles, Shi Dai, Boris Goncharov, Matthew Kerr

TL;DR
This study searches for an isotropic gravitational-wave background using 18 years of pulsar timing data from the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, detecting a common noise process with spatial correlations consistent with gravitational waves.
Contribution
It presents the first comprehensive analysis of an isotropic gravitational-wave background using the PPTA's extensive data set with Bayesian inference and spatial correlation validation.
Findings
Detected a common-spectrum noise process with specific amplitude and spectral index.
Measured spatial correlations consistent with gravitational-wave background at about 2 sigma significance.
Time-dependent signal strength suggests caution in interpreting the results.
Abstract
Pulsar timing arrays aim to detect nanohertz-frequency gravitational waves (GWs). A background of GWs modulates pulsar arrival times and manifests as a stochastic process, common to all pulsars, with a signature spatial correlation. Here we describe a search for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) using observations of 30 millisecond pulsars from the third data release of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA), which spans 18 years. Using current Bayesian inference techniques we recover and characterize a common-spectrum noise process. Represented as a strain spectrum , we measure and respectively (median and 68% credible interval). For a spectral index of , corresponding to an isotropic background of GWs radiated by inspiraling supermassive black hole…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
