Localized Text-to-Image Generation for Free via Cross Attention Control
Yutong He, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, J. Zico Kolter

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple, inference-only method called cross attention control (CAC) that enables localized text-to-image generation without additional training, improving localization and compositionality in existing models.
Contribution
The paper proposes CAC, a novel inference-time technique for localized text-to-image generation that requires no training or architecture changes, enhancing existing models' capabilities.
Findings
CAC improves localization accuracy across various location inputs.
CAC enhances the compositional capabilities of state-of-the-art models.
A standardized evaluation suite was developed for automatic assessment of localization quality.
Abstract
Despite the tremendous success in text-to-image generative models, localized text-to-image generation (that is, generating objects or features at specific locations in an image while maintaining a consistent overall generation) still requires either explicit training or substantial additional inference time. In this work, we show that localized generation can be achieved by simply controlling cross attention maps during inference. With no additional training, model architecture modification or inference time, our proposed cross attention control (CAC) provides new open-vocabulary localization abilities to standard text-to-image models. CAC also enhances models that are already trained for localized generation when deployed at inference time. Furthermore, to assess localized text-to-image generation performance automatically, we develop a standardized suite of evaluations using large…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 Conference Withdrawn Submission
The paper is very interesting and does a great job in terms of comparing the proposed approach with prior works. The results look great and the evaluations are solid. Overall, an impressive work that could have diverse applications in Gen AI applications.
I do not find any major weaknesses with this work. I have a few questions: (1) How does the proposed approach compares to approaches like LayoutGPT in terms of quality. LayoutGPT[1] also doesn’t require any additional training and leverages the GLIGEN model. (2) The work mainly leverages models like SD 1.4 and SD 2.1. Will some of the issues spotted in this paper applicable to more recent models like SDXL 1.0? (3) In Figure 1, it was mentioned that the proposed method is applicable to localized
(1) The CAC method is inspiring and easy to plug-and-play. It illuminates pathways for enhancing localized text-to-image generation without invoking the necessity for extraneous training processes or model modifications. (2) The paper presents insightful empirical findings, demonstrating the effectiveness of CAC in improving localized generation performance with various types of location information.
(1) The concept of Cross-Attention Control (CAC), as depicted, follows previously explored methods, particularly resonating with well-known prompt-to-prompt methodologies. This semblance somewhat tempers the uniqueness, with the application of CAC appearing slightly surface-level without a profound analytical delve, thereby moderating the technical novelty. (2) The terrain of localized content generation isn’t uncharted, with prior scholarly explorations such as GLIGEN, T2I-adapter, ControlNet,
- With an analysis of the cross-attention mechanism and given various localization cues, one can manipulate the generated outputs reflecting the cues. - No significant additional inference time.
- There are several similar works manipulating the cross attention maps [1-3], which are not mentioned in this work. Compared with these, what points are similar and different? What would you highlight as novel contributions? * [1] Kim et al. (2023). Dense Text-to-Image Generation with Attention Modulation. http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12964 * [2] Phung et al. (2023) Grounded text-to-image synthesis with attention refocusing. http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05427 * [3] Chen et al. (2023) Training-
1. This problem is of paramount importance in the field of text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models and has garnered significant research interest. 2. The proposed solution is elegantly simple. It involves controlling the cross-attention mechanism without incurring any additional computational overhead or memory usage. Moreover, it does not require any additional training. 3. The quality of the generated images appears to be quite impressive, as evidenced by the results presented in both the main
1. Novelty and Related Work: As I point out, the problem of layout control in text-to-image (T2I) models has received significant attention in previous research (citing references [1–14]). I would like to say that the paper lacks a thorough introduction and organization of related work in this area. 2. Comparisons and Advantages: I would like to highlight the need for comparisons between the proposed CAC method and existing methods (specifically, references [1–14]). This paper should at least a
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
