Comment on "Light-induced melting of competing stripe orders without introducing superconductivity in La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$" (arXiv:2306.07869v1)

TL;DR

This paper critiques a previous study on light-induced effects in cuprates, arguing that their conclusion about the absence of transient superconductivity is unwarranted due to experimental limitations and overgeneralization.

Contribution

It challenges the extrapolation that stripe order melting cannot induce superconductivity in cuprates, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive experiments.

Findings

Previous studies showed mixed results on light-induced superconductivity.

Experimental parameters like fluence and wavelength critically affect outcomes.

Negative results in one compound do not rule out effects in others.

Abstract

In the manuscript arXiv:2306.07869v1, N. L. Wang and co-authors report the results of a near-infrared pump / terahertz probe study in the stripe-ordered cuprate La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$. They measured a change in optical conductivity, but did not find signatures of transient superconductivity. From this observation they extrapolate that in all cuprates in which striped states have been excited with light, there must be no light-induced superconductivity. They conclude that "transient superconductivity cannot be induced by melting of the competing stripe orders with pump pulses whose photon energy is much higher than the superconducting gap of cuprates." Here we show that this extrapolation is unwarranted. First, the absence of light-induced superconductivity in this particular compound was already reported in a previous paper, which instead showed positive evidence for La$_{1.885}$Ba$_{0.115}$CuO$_4$. In addition, the experiment discussed here used photo-excitation with too low fluence and at a suboptimal wavelength. More broadly, a negative result in one compound is rarely compelling indication of the absence of an effect in an entire class of materials.