Homotopic classification of band structures: Stable, fragile, delicate, and stable representation-protected topology
Piet W. Brouwer, Vatsal Dwivedi

TL;DR
This paper develops a homotopic classification framework for band structures that extends beyond stable equivalence, incorporating additional lattice symmetries to distinguish fragile, delicate, and stable topologies, and their boundary phenomena.
Contribution
It introduces a homotopic approach to classify band topologies considering lattice symmetries, revealing new stable topology types with boundary states.
Findings
Complete classifications for specific symmetries
Identification of stable topology with boundary states
Distinction between fragile, delicate, and stable topologies
Abstract
The topological classification of gapped band structures depends on the particular definition of topological equivalence. For translation-invariant systems, stable equivalence is defined by a lack of restrictions on the numbers of occupied and unoccupied bands, while imposing restrictions on one or both leads to ``fragile'' and ``delicate'' topology, respectively. In this article, we describe a homotopic classification of band structures -- which captures the topology beyond the stable equivalence -- in the presence of additional lattice symmetries. As examples, we present complete homotopic classifications for spinless band structures with twofold rotation, fourfold rotation and fourfold dihedral symmetries, both in presence and absence of time-reversal symmetry. Whereas the rules of delicate and fragile topology do not admit a bulk-boundary correspondence, we identify a version of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
