Consumption Partial Insurance in the Presence of Tail Income Risk
Anisha Ghosh, Alexandros Theloudis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework to measure how consumption responds to income shocks, especially extreme tail risks, revealing asymmetric effects and variation across demographics using recent data.
Contribution
It develops a nonlinear consumption model incorporating higher-order income moments and estimates asymmetric pass-through rates of income shocks to consumption.
Findings
17% pass-through for negative shocks versus 9% for positive shocks
Pass-through rates increase with the severity of shocks
Tail income risk significantly influences consumption behavior
Abstract
We propose a simple framework to measure consumption insurance against income shocks that accounts for higher-order moments of the income distribution. We derive a nonlinear consumption function in which the extent of insurance varies with both the sign and magnitude of shocks. Using recent PSID data, we estimate an asymmetric pass-through of bad versus good permanent shocks - 17% of a 3 sigma negative shock transmits to consumption versus 9% of an equal-sized positive shock - with greater pass-through as shocks worsen. These consumption transmission rates further vary by age, wealth, and along the income distribution. Our results align with survey responses to hypothetical events and suggest that tail risk matters substantially for consumption.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact · Agricultural risk and resilience
