Prismatic $F$-crystals and $E$-crystalline Galois representations
Dat Pham

TL;DR
This paper establishes an equivalence between prismatic $F$-crystals and $E$-crystalline Galois representations over a discretely valued field, extending prior results to more general coefficient fields.
Contribution
It generalizes the equivalence between prismatic $F$-crystals and crystalline Galois representations to include arbitrary finite extensions of $Q_p$, broadening the scope of previous work.
Findings
Proves an equivalence of categories for prismatic $F$-crystals and $E$-crystalline representations.
Introduces a simplified, refined proof technique avoiding the Beilinson fibre sequence.
Extends the main result of prior work to more general coefficient fields.
Abstract
Let be a complete discretely valued field of mixed characteristic with perfect residue field, and let be a finite extension of contained in . We show that the category of prismatic -crystals on (relative to in a suitable sense) is equivalent to the category of -lattices in -crystalline representations defined by Kisin--Ren, extending the main result of \cite{arxiv:2106.14735} in the case . As a key ingredient in the proof, by adapting a lemma of Du--Liu, we prove a general full faithfulness result for certain vector bundles on the prismatic site, which simplifies and refines the key descent step in the approach of Bhatt--Scholze without invoking the Beilinson fibre sequence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
