An alternative view: satisfaction of the four variable Belli inequality using quantum correlations

TL;DR

This paper presents an algebraic perspective on Bell inequalities, emphasizing their identity nature and analyzing the implications of quantum correlations, challenging traditional interpretations of inequality violations in quantum mechanics.

Contribution

It introduces an algebraic framework for Bell inequalities, reinterprets their limits as identity inequalities, and discusses the logical consistency of applying these to quantum experiments.

Findings

Bell inequalities are algebraic identities, not statistical limits.

Quantum correlations can satisfy these algebraic inequalities.

Violation of inequalities does not necessarily imply nonexistence of underlying variables.

Abstract

The algebraic derivation of the numerical limits of Bell inequalities in either three or four random variables is independent of the assumption of randomness.The limits of the inequalities follow as mathematical consequences of their created algebraic structures independently of application to random or deterministic variables.The inequalities should be called identity inequalities.A final correlation reuses data from the previous correlations and thus leads to the inequality limits.It generally has a different functional form from the previous correlations, whether derived as a counterfactual mathematical result, or in a way enabling comparison with experiment.These algebraic facts and their consequences are central to understanding the inequalities use, but have not been widely recognized.Logically consistent application of the inequalities to Bell experiments is challenging, given that the number of mathematically assumed random variables is greater than the number of physical variables produced per experimental realization.Given Bells rejection of the use of sequential, alternative paths, three experimental runs are here considered to enable acquisition of data to be rearranged for computation of statistical crosscorrelations.Predicted quantum mechanical correlations then satisfy the inequality.Since mathematically inconsistent use is sufficient to cause inequality violation, the conclusion that violation implies the nonexistence of underlying variables in the entanglement process does not follow.