Morphological Inflection with Phonological Features
David Guriel, Omer Goldman, Reut Tsarfaty

TL;DR
This paper investigates how incorporating phonological features into neural morphological models affects performance, finding that models can infer phonological patterns from character distributions without explicit phoneme representations.
Contribution
It introduces two methods for integrating phonological features into morphological models and demonstrates their effectiveness across multiple languages.
Findings
Methods yield comparable or minor improvements over baseline
Models can infer phonological patterns from character data
Explicit phoneme features are not always necessary for good performance
Abstract
Recent years have brought great advances into solving morphological tasks, mostly due to powerful neural models applied to various tasks as (re)inflection and analysis. Yet, such morphological tasks cannot be considered solved, especially when little training data is available or when generalizing to previously unseen lemmas. This work explores effects on performance obtained through various ways in which morphological models get access to subcharacter phonological features that are the targets of morphological processes. We design two methods to achieve this goal: one that leaves models as is but manipulates the data to include features instead of characters, and another that manipulates models to take phonological features into account when building representations for phonemes. We elicit phonemic data from standard graphemic data using language-specific grammars for languages with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling · Speech Recognition and Synthesis
