Are ChatGPT and Other Similar Systems the Modern Lernaean Hydras of AI?
Dimitrios Ioannidis, Jeremy Kepner, Andrew Bowne, Harriet S. Bryant

TL;DR
This paper critically examines how AI systems like ChatGPT access and potentially misuse open-source code, proposing legal and licensing reforms to protect developers' rights and ensure sustainable AI innovation.
Contribution
It introduces specific legal and licensing reforms aimed at regulating AI access to open-source code and advocates for legislative action to safeguard innovation.
Findings
AI systems may infringe on open-source licenses
Proposed licensing reforms to limit AI access to open-source code
Legislative measures needed to protect developers and promote innovation
Abstract
The rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems ("AI systems") has created unprecedented social engagement. AI code generation systems provide responses (output) to questions or requests by accessing the vast library of open-source code created by developers over the past few decades. However, they do so by allegedly stealing the open-source code stored in virtual libraries, known as repositories. This Article focuses on how this happens and whether there is a solution that protects innovation and avoids years of litigation. We also touch upon the array of issues raised by the relationship between AI and copyright. Looking ahead, we propose the following: (a) immediate changes to the licenses for open-source code created by developers that will limit access and/or use of any open-source code to humans only; (b) we suggest revisions to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property
MethodsLib · Focus
