Inference in clustered IV models with many and weak instruments
Johannes W. Ligtenberg

TL;DR
This paper develops new statistical tests for instrumental variable models with many and weak instruments in clustered data, addressing the limitations of existing tests that assume independence.
Contribution
It introduces cluster-based adaptations of jackknife Anderson--Rubin and score tests for weak and many instruments, applicable to clustered data.
Findings
New tests perform well in simulations.
Revisiting a historical study demonstrates empirical relevance.
Addresses limitations of previous tests for clustered data.
Abstract
Data clustering reduces the effective sample size from the number of observations towards the number of clusters. For instrumental variable models this reduced effective sample size makes the instruments more likely to be weak, in the sense that they contain little information about the endogenous regressor, and many, in the sense that their number is large compared to the sample size. Consequently, weak and many instrument problems for estimators and tests in instrumental variable models are also more likely. None of the previously developed many and weak instrument robust tests, however, can be applied to clustered data as they all require independent observations. Therefore, I adapt the many and weak instrument robust jackknife Anderson--Rubin and jackknife score tests to clustered data by removing clusters rather than individual observations from the statistics. Simulations and a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Stochastic processes and financial applications · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
MethodsNone
